wild type meg 01 cells (ATCC)
Structured Review

Wild Type Meg 01 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1370 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/wild type meg 01 cells/product/ATCC
Average 98 stars, based on 1370 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Platelet-like particles released from Ebola virus-infected megakaryocytic cells behave like virus-like particles"
Article Title: Platelet-like particles released from Ebola virus-infected megakaryocytic cells behave like virus-like particles
Journal: PLOS Pathogens
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013985
Figure Legend Snippet: A. Percentage of GFP-positive MEG-01 VP30 cells. PMA-treated or untreated cells were exposed to EBOVΔVP30-GFP at an MOI of 5 and GFP-positive cells were quantified by flow cytometry 2 days after exposure. Data are representative of two independent experiments. B. EBOVΔVP30 titers from MEG-01 VP30 cells. PMA-treated or untreated cells were exposed to EBOVΔVP30-GFP at an MOI of 1. Supernatants were collected daily, and viral titers were determined using Vero VP30 cells. Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments. The dotted lines indicate the lower limit of detection (20 ffu/ml). Statistical significance was assessed by using the multiple unpaired t-test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: A. Detection of EBOV proteins by western blot from PLPs released form EBOVΔVP30-exposed MEG-01 VP30 cells. PLPs were collected on day 4 post-exposure from PMA-treated MEG-01 WT or VP30 cells exposed to EBOVΔVP30 at an MOI of 5. The indicated proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting. Data are representative of two independent experiments. B. Relative amount of EBOV gRNA in PLPs released from EBOVΔVP30-exposed MEG-01 VP30 cells. PLPs were prepared as described in (A). EBOV gRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using the indicated genome-specific primer pairs and normalized to the gRNA in PLPs from MEG-01 WT cells. Data are presented as means ± SD from two independent experiments performed in triplicate. C. Localization of EBOV GP in PLPs released from EBOVΔVP30-exposed MEG-01 VP30 cells. PLPs were prepared as described in (A). The platelet marker CD41 (magenta) and EBOV GP (green) were visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy using specific antibodies, along with the corresponding bright-field image. Scale bars, 5 μm. D. Interaction between EBOV NP/VP35 (top panel) and NP/VP40 (bottom panel) in PLPs released from EBOVΔVP30-exposed MEG-01 VP30 cells. PLPs were prepared as described in (A). NP/VP35 and NP/VP40 complexes (green) were visualized by using a proximity ligation assay (PLA) with specific antibodies and overlaid on the corresponding bright-field image. Scale bars, 5 μm.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR, Marker, Immunofluorescence, Microscopy, Proximity Ligation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Relative expression levels of EBOV mRNA (A) and gRNA (B) in PLPs released from EBOVΔVP30-exposed MEG-01 VP30 cells. PLPs were collected on day 4 post-exposure from PMA-treated MEG-01 VP30 cells exposed to EBOVΔVP30-GFP at an MOI of 5. EBOV mRNA and gRNA were quantified by RT-qPCR using the indicated specific primer pairs and normalized to the amount in the day 0 samples. Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR
Figure Legend Snippet: A,B. Expression levels of GP and CD41-mCherry in MEG-01 cells stably expressing CD41-mCherry with or without EBOV GP (A), and in PLPs released from these stable cell lines (B). Protein levels were analyzed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. C. Percent of mCherry-positive cells that internalized PLPs containing CD41-mCherry or CD41-mCherry/GP. Huh7 VP30 cells were co-incubated with the indicated PLPs for 1, 3, or 5 h, followed by quantification of mCherry-positive cells by flow cytometry. Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance was assessed by use of a two-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Stable Transfection, Western Blot, Incubation, Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: Number of GFP-positive cells following co-incubation with PLPs released from EBOVΔVP30-exposed MEG-01 cells (A). PLPs were collected from PMA-treated MEG-01 WT and VP30 cells exposed to EBOVΔVP30-GFP. Huh7 VP30 cells (2 x 10 5 cells) were co-incubated with the indicated PLPs (2 x 10 6 ) for two days. As a control, cells were cultured in the final wash supernatant (B). GFP-positive cells were quantified by flow cytometry. Data are representative of two independent experiments. C-E. EBOVΔVP30 titers in three different VP30-expressing cell types co-cultured with PLPs released from EBOVΔVP30-exposed MEG-01 VP30 cells. PLPs were prepared as described in (A). Huh7 VP30 cells (2 x 10 5 cells, C), HUVEC VP30 cells (2 x 10 5 cells, D), and PMA-differentiated THP-1 VP30 cells (2 x 10 5 cells, E) were co-cultured with the indicated PLPs (2 x 10 6 ). Virus titers on days 2, 4, and 6 were determined using Vero VP30 cells. Data are presented as means ± SD of three independent experiments. The dotted lines indicate the lower limit of detection (1.3 log10 ffu/ml). Statistical significance was assessed by use of a one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey’s multiple comparisons test. *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Incubation, Control, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Virus